Showing posts with label domestic partner registry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label domestic partner registry. Show all posts

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Quote of the Day: Shoving it "down our throats"

By Diane Silver

The Kansas House debate over banning domestic partner registries prompted what may be the best quote I've seen in a while.

The Lawrence Journal-World reports that the sponsor of ban, Rep. Lance Kinzer, R-Olathe, "said if couples are denied health insurance because they are unmarried, then they should get married."

That brought a sharp response from state Rep. Thomas “Tim” Owens, R-Overland Park, who said, “We are a nation of freedom, and I get real tired of hearing people try to shove down our throats how they believe that everybody else should act.”

Oh yeah.

PHOTO: Rep. Tim Owens

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

What did the Kansas House just do to domestic partner registries?

By Diane Silver

[updated]

Here's the quick version: The Kansas House just voted 66 to 50 to refer the proposed statewide ban on domestic partner registries -- House Bill 2299 -- to the House Judiciary Committee for more study. This means the ban is still alive, but not moving forward. The ban itself did NOT come up for a vote by the full House.

The vote on referring the bill to committee was a recorded roll call vote. Once the House Journal for today is posted, we can see how everyone voted.

Much parliamentary maneuvering ensued before House voted to refer the bill back to committee.

An amendment was offered, and House members debated whether the amendment was "germane." In other words, the question was whether the amendment dealt with the same issue as the original bill. Under legislative rules only germane issues can be considered. The legislative expert on rules, the chair of the rules committee, declared that the amendment was not germane, and an unrecorded vote upheld his ruling.

Rep. Paul Davis, D-Lawrence, then provided background on Lawrence's domestic partner registry. He eventually moved that the bill be referred to the House Judiciary Committee, and won that vote.

Bottom line is that Davis succeeded in taking the bill back to the beginning of the legislative process. HB 2299 now has to go through these steps to become law.
  1. Be approved by a vote of the Judiciary Committee
  2. Be approved by a vote of the full House
  3. Be considered by a Senate Committee
  4. Be approved by a Senate Committee
  5. Be approved by the full Senate
  6. Be signed by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius
And so the saga continues. Stay tuned.

Happening Now: Listen live to the Kansas House debating a ban on domestic partner registries

By Diane Silver

The Kansas House is currently debating House Bill 2299, which bans domestic partner registries throughout the state. You can listen live via the Internet.

The sponsor of the bill, Rep. Lance Kinzer, has just verified that the bill is RETROACTIVE. That means it would render null and void Lawrence's domestic partner registry.

At 12:14 p.m., the House was waiting to hear a ruling from the Rules Committee chair on whether an amendment to the bill could be made. Right now all you will hear is background noise.

Stay tuned.

Domestic Registry Ban: Have you called your representative yet?

By Diane Silver

Call your representative by 11 am to save the domestic partner registry in Lawrence. Block the ban on fairness!

See more here.

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

ALERT: Ban on Domestic Partner Registries slated for vote; call the Kansas House NOW

By Diane Silver

Word has come from the Kansas Equality Coalition that the state House of Representatives plans to vote tomorrow on a bill banning domestic partner registries throughout the state.

We think the bill could void the registry passed by the Lawrence City Commission in August. The legislation -- House Bill 2299 -- would also make it impossible for any other city in Kansas to pass a registry.

Call your representative in the Kansas House NOW. You must call before they go into session at 11 a.m. tomorrow. Tell them to vote NO.

More details, talking points and contact information for legislators can be found at the Equality Coalition web site.

To find your representative, check here.

(Transparency alert: I helped write the KEC action alert.)

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

Kansas' historic domestic partner registry in pictures

By Diane Silver

Here is an index to all the photos and Kansas Voice posts on today's start of the state's first domestic partner registry. These are in the order in which they were originally posted.

History is made in Kansas

Lawrence domestic partner registry prompts celebration

Celebrating just a tiny bit of fairness at Lawrence City Hall today

Officials help with domestic partner celebration

Domestic partner registry brings smiles to Kansas

More on the opening of the domestic partner registry

Laughter & smiles light up City Hall

A thousand apologies for the fuzzy quality of many of these photos. I have much to learn about digital cameras.

Kansas makes history with its first domestic partner registry

By Diane Silver

State. Sen. Marci Francisco wandered through the crowd passing out heart-shaped boxes of chocolates to happy couples, and people cheered as the city of Lawrence made history today.

Kansas' first domestic partners registered this morning in a packed room, crowded with couples, friends, reporters and photographers. Many of the couples who registered this morning had been together for more than a decade.

More photos and more posts on Kansas Voice.

------

PHOTO: By Diane Silver, fuzzily destroying the art of photography.

Teeny, tiny baby steps towards fairness for lesbian and gay families in Kansas


By Diane Silver

The city of Lawrence launches Kansas' first domestic partner registry.

Click here to see the "evil" scene, the radical right doesn't want you to see.

Friday, July 27, 2007

Lawrence launches the first domestic partner registry in Kansas in just 5 days

By Diane Silver

The Kansas Equality Coalition is planning an event at 10 a.m. on Aug. 1 to mark the start of the state's first registry.

This is a great day for the Sunflower State. It's only a small step, but any progress toward fairness is welcome in a state where same-sex couples face discrimination every day.

More details at Kansas Voice.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

What's next for Kansas' new domestic partner registry

Both the mundane and, let's say, the profane are expected in the next few months now that the Lawrence City Commission has passed a domestic partner registry.

The registry is the first in the Sunflower State. Although only residents of Lawrence are allowed to register, the city's action is still significant.

Find out more at Kansas Voice.

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

BREAKING NEWS: City passes 1st domestic partner registry in Kansas history

By Diane Silver

With no discussion and taking mere minutes to do it, The Lawrence City Commission passed the the domestic partner registry.

This third and final vote made the proposal official. Once again, the vote was 4-1 with the only no vote belonging to Commissioner Mike Amyx.

For the first time in Kansas history, same-sex couples have a means of getting public acknowledgment of their relationships.

The registry goes into effect Aug. 1. Details on the new registry can be found in the approved ordinance.

The vote was a tad anti-climactic. Last week the commission room was packed with opponents. Before it was packed with proponents, who spilled out into the City Hall lobby. This week opponents of the proposal were nowhere to be found.

For full details see Kansas Voice.

Friday, June 15, 2007

I make the news

By Diane Silver

Yup, there I am on TV news, standing up for the local domestic partner registry. Ah, that we were celebrating winning marriage rights, but we get what we can.

By the way, I hate seeing myself on TV, so I haven't looked at this. Someone tell me if I am coherent.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Kansas: Lawrence domestic partner registry passes vote -- one more to go!

By Diane Silver

If you're looking for Kansas news and commentary, please look for the headlines at the top of this blog just under the In This Moment logo.

However, this is too good to just put up in that tiny print. The Lawrence City Commission has just approved the domestic partner registry on first reading. One more vote to go and this thing is finally a reality!

More details at Kansas Voice, along with live blogging of the meeting.

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Sunday, June 03, 2007

A Kansas Voice Sampler: 8 wonders, bad Lance Kinzer & help for Greensburg

By Diane Silver

Over at the Kansas Voice, I'm taking on the good, the bad and the helpful of the Sunflower State.

What's So Cool about Kansas? Let Me Count the Ways.
The Eight Wonders of Kansas & a blogger lists the good, bad and ugly of the state.

Kinzer Says He Won't Stop Trying to Ban Domestic Partner Registries
Lawrence moves forward. Lance gets cranky.

Kansas Restaurants Serve Up Food to Help Greensburg
Thursday is the day to eat at select Kansas restaurants that have pledged to give a percentage of their proceeds to help the victims of the Greensburg tornado.
------------------------
PHOTO: A slice of Harland Schuster's photo of the Gyp Hills Scenic Drive, one of the candidates for the Eight Wonders of Kansas contest. Visit the Kansas Sampler Foundation web site to see the rest of the photo.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Lawrence gets ready to launch Kansas' first domestic partner registry, perhaps by Aug. 1

By Diane Silver

[updated 8:07 a.m. 5/23]
Before a room packed with Kansas Equality Coalition members wearing brown and yellow coalition stickers, the Lawrence City Commission tonight voted 4-1 to make the state's first domestic partner registry a reality.

So many supporters of the registry showed up at the meeting that chairs had to be placed in the lobby of City Hall.

Two more votes are required to institute the registry in Lawrence. However, long-time city observers say they have never known of the Commission to backtrack on an issue once it has received this kind of first-round support.

The only commissioner who voted no was Mike Amyx.

The yes votes were Mayor Sue Hack, Commissioner Boog Highberger and newly elected commissioners Rob Chestnut and Mike Dever.

Hack and Highberger spoke passionately of their support for the registry. Hack said she supported it with both her mind and heart. Highberger noted that this kind of law should really be done on the federal or state level, but that those governments have failed to perform their responsibilities.

"If we're going to have the kind of city we want, we have to deal with this on the local level," he said.

Chestnut said he was voting for the registry because of the service it provided to the citizens of Lawrence. However, he said that he had supported the 2005 statewide ban on same-sex marriage.

Among those speaking in favor of the registry was the Rev. Peter Luckey, senior pastor at Plymouth Congregational Church, and former Lawrence Mayor Mike Rundle, who retired from the Commission in April.

Four people spoke in opposition to the registry, including one minister.None of the opponents represented a group. There did not appear to be any organized opposition.

Among those speaking in favor of the registry were representatives of MAINstream Coalition, The League of Women Voters, PFLAG and the Grassroots Coalition. (I know of the Grassroots organization, but like a dolt didn't write the correct name down of this fine activist organization. Bad blogger... but I digress.)

What the Commission technically did was to instruct its staff to make some minor revisions in the ordinance, and then to bring it back for the Commission's June 12 meeting. The ordinance will be up for one more vote, probably on June 19. That will finalize the ordinance and officially make Lawrence the first city in the state with a domestic partner registry.

Lawrence City Manager David Corliss said the he hopes to have the registry ready and open for business by August 1. However, Corliss admitted that was an ambitious timeline. That date could change.

As approved tonight, the registry would cover both same-sex and straight couples. Only residents of Lawrence will be able to register. A fee will be charged. Corliss said that fee may be in the ballpark of $25 to $35, but he said that he couldn't yet commit to a figure. The fee could be higher. It will have to cover the costs of the registry.

At this point, it appears that registrations will be conducted online, although details still have to be worked out.

Commissioner Highberger explored the possibility of allowing non-Lawrence residents who work in Lawrence to register, but that idea was postponed. It appears that the Commission may ask Attorney General Paul Morrison to comment on the constitutionality of such an idea and then come back and amend the ordinance.

[update]

Here's the Lawrence Journal-World's take on the City Commission meeting. Fox 4 TV in Kansas City has a video report of the meeting. Other news coverage came from the Topeka Capital-Journal.

Lawrence, Kansas, City Commission votes 4-1 for domestic partner registry

By Diane Silver

I just got back from the City Commission meeting, and to make a long story short: We've got it!

Two more votes are required by the City Commission to finalize the deal, but with tonight's 4-1 vote the City Commission is ready to make Lawrence the first city in the Kansas with a domestic partner registry.

More soon.

Kansas: Newspaper says domestic partner registry has "more than a fighting chance"

By Diane Silver

The Lawrence Journal-World previews tonight's City Commission meeting on the proposed domestic partner registry.
From early indications, the effort has more than a fighting chance.

“From what I can tell, there is some support on the commission for passing it,” said City Commissioner Mike Dever, who said he was leaning toward voting for the registry. “We’ve gotten a lot of information on it, a lot of feedback on it.”

New commissioners Dever and Rob Chestnut also told the newspaper they have heard from more supporters than opponents of the proposal.

My thoughts? I honestly don't know what will happen. I've seen too many efforts to pass fair laws fail to be 100 percent optimistic. On the other hand, I think we've got a real chance. If the registry does fail, I know that life will get very interesting in this town.

I'll be there tonight. Will you?

Monday, May 21, 2007

Kansas: Lawrence takes up the domestic partner registry tomorrow

By Diane Silver

Tomorrow is the day and Lawrence City Hall is the place to be. The City Commission will take up the proposed domestic partner registry at its regular Tuesday night meeting. Public comments will be heard and the first of two required votes is expected.

When the local chapter of the Kansas Equality Coalition first brought the registry before the commission in January, supporters had the stage to themselves. I doubt very much if that will happen again on Tuesday. Opponents may well be out in force.

If you support the registry, please attend. You don't have to testify. Your polite and quiet presence will make a difference. The Equality Coalition plans to have stickers for registry supporters to wear to identify themselves.

If you do plan to testify, please keep it short. Don't repeat what someone else has said even if that person made the point you want to make. Just say you agree with the previous speaker. Above all be polite. Be nice! Neither the City Commission nor the staff are our enemies.

If the commission takes on other issues after dealing with the registry, leave the Commission Meeting Room quietly. Also be aware that when we're talking in the City Hall lobby, our conversations can be heard in the meeting room. To discuss, debate, celebrate or agonize over the events in the meeting, our best bet is to talk on the sidewalk outside of City Hall.

City staff have outlined possible ways to implement the registry and reported on the experiences of other cities.

Attorney General Paul Morrison's opinion that the registry is constitutional is also available online.

The City Commission meeting is in the City Commission Meeting Room, First Floor, City Hall, 6 East 6th Street. The meetings adjourn at 10:30 p.m. unless extended by the Commission.

You can still contact City Commissioners to politely urge them to vote yes on the registry.

Here are some of my earlier thoughts on the registry:

Why I support a domestic partner registry

Just the Facts: Domestic Partner Registries stretch across the U.S. & present few problems