Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Could Barack Obama be the real thing, or is he just another disappointment?

By Diane Silver

I am starving for politics that go beyond conservative or liberal, left or right. I am starving for politicians who care more about good government than power. I am desperate for leaders who have dealt with enough of their own hang-ups to act authentically and courageously.

Yesterday, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama announced that he is forming a committee to explore running for president. Is he as good as he seems at first glance, or is he just another fraud?

Read more at Becoming The Change.

Enough is enough! March on Washington Jan. 27 for an end to the war in Iraq

By Diane Silver

Here's an important story that both the mainstream media and blogosphere appear to be ignoring: United for Peace and Justice is organizing a march on Washington for Jan. 27.

It's time to call an end to the Iraq War and to George Bush's escalation. It's time to stop waiting for Congress, and it's long past time to stop waiting for Bush to come to his senses.

More information on the march is here.

Founded in 2002, United for Peace and Justice is a coalition of more than 1,300 local and national groups throughout the United States who have joined together to protest the Iraq War and to "oppose our government's policy of permanent warfare and empire-building."

Kansas: As district attorney, Phill Kline says he's above the law -- or at least the rules

[updated 7:30 a.m. 1/17/07]

By Diane Silver

The dispute between new Johnson County District Attorney Phill Kline and the eight employees he fired on his first day on the job is going to court.

The KC Star reports that the seven prosecutors and chief investigator filed by Kline filed suit against the new DA today in Johnson County District Court.

What's really curious about this situation is that Kline claims that he is above the rules of the county, which declare that employees can only be fired for cause. Unlike his predecesser, Paul Morrison, Kline believes he can ignore rules and guidelines. All of which leads me to wonder if one of the county's chief law enforcement officers also believes he is above the law.

The Star explains:
In a letter to (county) commissioners Friday, Kline said state statute designates him as an executive officer of the 10th judicial district. Under the statute, the letter states, his office is considered “a separate entity within said district for administrative purposes.” In addition, the letter said, a district attorney is not bound by a county’s personnel policies or rules.
As always with this darling of the religious right, the story never seems to end. Stay tuned.

[Update]

This news doesn't deserve an entire post to itself because it's a kinda yes-kinda no, ah, kinda thing. A Johnson County district judge has ordered Kline to participate in the county's normal grievance procedure and to actually go to grievance hearings with his fired employees. (That's the good new.) However, that order is on hold until a hearing can be held by another judge on Tuesday. (Not so good.)

Once again, stay tuned for further developments.

If we are going to change the world, we have to throw out our old ideas about news

By Diane Silver

In my first post at Becoming The Change, I talked about how one of the routine chores of this blog will be to look at the news from a changemaker's perspective.

The next thought that popped into my head, of course, was: So, what the heck IS a changemaker's perspective?

Read more...

The problem with water & why "Becoming The Change" exists

By Diane Silver

We are all fish, swimming in the water of our culture, and frankly, that is a huge problem. For more, check out the inaugural post of Becoming The Change.

A New Venture: The Hope & Politics Group

By Diane Silver

I'm pleased to announce that we're starting a new venture in this corner of the Internet where hope and politics collide.

Today we're launching the first in what I hope will soon become a larger group of blogs. Together these blogs will be known, not surprisingly, as The Hope & Politics Group.

For those of you who are fans of In This Moment, don't worry. Nothing will change, except that you should soon be seeing more posts.

In This Moment will continue to feature original commentary and news from myself, Nancy Jane Moore and Pamela K. Taylor. However, In This Moment will also feature short descriptions and links to posts on the other blogs in the group. We plan to work this a bit like Josh Marshall does Talking Points Memo, which serves as a central home for several other blogs in his group. To put it another way, In This Moment will act as a clearinghouse for all the blogs in the Hope & Politics group.

The first blog to join the group is called Becoming The Change.

This is my baby because it explores an idea dear to my heart -- the idea that we can create a world based on authenticity, fairness, kindness, respect for others and peace. Becoming The Change is a political blog and community for people who refuse to bow to "realism." This is a home for dreamers, a place to get news, resources and create connections for those who can both envision this world and take action to create it.

Becoming The Change has been heavily influenced by Michael Lerner's The Left Hand of God and Paul Ray and Sherry Ruth Anderson's Cultural Creatives.

As I see how this new blog goes, I hope to eventually add a blog called The Equality Post, which will focus on the struggle for fair laws for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered people, and The Truth About Kansas, which will focus on heartland politics and happenings.

At some point, I expect that we will be adding advertising. I know that some people hate this, but the hard truth is that the more money we all make off blogging, the more time we can spend doing it.

Monday, January 15, 2007

Nancy Jane is on the radio today



By Nancy Jane Moore

I'm going to be on the radio today, reading a short essay called "I Believe in Fiction." It will air during the 11 AM ET hour on WETA-FM (90.9 FM) in metropolitan Washington, D.C., on the local program "The Intersection."

WETA is streamed online. The Intersection website also provides a podcast of the show and the opportunity to listen to individual segments after the show airs.

My essay is also on The Intersection website as a pdf file.

The gist of my essay is that fiction is important in helping us make sense of our lives and the world we live in. If you get a chance to listen or to read the essay, please feel free to comment here.

Sunday, January 14, 2007

Thinking about Dr. King

By Nancy Jane Moore

My freshman year college roommate had a 7:30 class Thursday mornings. She also had a bad habit of waking up before her clock radio went off and heading out to the bathroom, so that I was frequently awakened by the news.

Which is how I learned, on April 5, 1968, that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had been assassinated.

I can still remember how stunned I felt. I got up -- no thought of going back to sleep -- and went up the hall to the bathroom to tell my roommate. It had all happened the night before, but we weren't news junkies back in those days.

My biology professor canceled class, leaving us a message that we should think seriously about what had happened. I recall taking the bus to Houston that afternoon -- it was the beginning of spring break -- still in a state of shock.

In retrospect, it seems obvious that someone would kill Dr. King. In fact, it is probably more amazing that he wasn't murdered earlier. But even though I knew about lynchings and the violent attacks against Civil Rights marchers and even though I had been profoundly affected by the assassination of President Kennedy some four and half years earlier, Dr. King's death caught me completely off guard.

I didn't grow up in the deep South, in the part of the country where the worst battles of the Civil Rights Movement were fought. But in my hometown outside of Houston, Jim Crow still held sway despite Supreme Court rulings: I went to segregated schools until I was a senior in high school.

Yet today we have a federal holiday in honor of Dr. King. And -- as is often the case with people who are honored after their deaths -- we seem to pretend as a society that he was never a controversial figure. Every Jan. 15, radio stations will play his "I Have a Dream" speech and most of us will nod in agreement while listening to his stunning oratory.

But while bigotry might have been on its way out at the time of his death, it had by no means disappeared. Further, he had begun to speak out against the Vietnam War, which did not endear him to a president who had pushed through the Civil Rights Act. He was in Memphis, where he was shot, to help garbage workers who were on strike. Many thought he should not be trying to organize poor people; perhaps some feared that he might have some success at bringing together the poor across racial lines.

He was, in short, a thorn in the side of those in power to the end of his days. If he were still with us today, I suspect he would still be making trouble.

There were riots in 1968 after Dr. King was killed. Here in Washington, people who go back that far speak of the 1968 riots as a major changing point in the city. Many blighted neighborhoods date from that time -- most are just now being rebuilt. A lot of white people left the city.

I didn't move to Washington until 1980, and like most newcomers to a city, I have tended to assume it was always the way it seemed when I first moved to town. Riots and white flight seemed like a thing of the distant past -- even when they occurred at the time I was reeling from the shock of Dr. King's death. It's hard to keep all that in perspective.

But I think it about it now, because I live in a primarily black neighborhood that was mostly white before the 1968 riots. My next door neighbors were the first black family in the neighborhood -- they moved here in 1961. I know white people in nearby suburbs who grew up in this part of town. And, knowing the history, I know when they left.

I've lived here for 15 years. In the last couple of years, I've noticed a few more white people living in the area and Hispanic families are also moving in. Today's Washington Post speculates that Georgia Avenue (a couple of blocks away) may finally experience a long-awaited renaissance.

I know some Washingtonians worry that neighborhoods like mine will become all-white again, but I hope they won't. I hope this neighborhood and the others like it will gradually become more mixed. And even though I -- like most Americans -- would like to make a bundle off my house when it comes time to sell, I hope the neighborhood stays affordable. Ideally, children of all races and backgrounds would grow up around here, play together, go to school together, date and marry and raise more children in similar circumstances.

And while I'd also like to hope that our country will eventually live up to the ideals set out in our Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence, current events lead me to believe that we will always need outspoken leaders who challenge injustice in our society the way Dr. King did.

It would be a nice legacy for him if some of the children in our neighborhood grow up to become thorns in the side of the powerful.

Friday, January 12, 2007

Kansas: Phill Kline neglects the rulebook & gets in hot water during his 1st week as DA

By Diane Silver

While I was busy with the dentist, freshly anointed Johnson County District Attorney Phill Kline was stirring up trouble in his new job.

Apparently, when Kline cleaned house this week and booted out a bunch of experienced prosecutors and investigative staff, he neglected to read the county employee's manual, or perhaps he read it and ignored it. Either way, when Kline fired eight staffers, he may well have violated county rules, which state that such staff can only be fired for cause.

Being told they only had hours to clean out their desks made these staff a tad testy, and they proceeded to file a grievance against Kline. The County Commission proceeded to then say that Kline had until noon today to say if he would participate in grievance hearings, which apparently is the normal procedure in the county. At noon, Kline's reply was: No.

What happens next appears uncertain. One newspaper report says that the whole case could go to the Kansas attorney general, who is of course, Paul Morrison, who whopped Kline in the November election. One report says that the next move is up to the angry ex-employees.

Stay tuned.

Here are the latest news reports.

Kline says no

Kline ignored county rules, and fired employees say that criminals will profit

A Kansas City Star columnist says there's too much hysteria over Kline's firings

Personally, I sort of, but don't quite agree with columnist Mike Hendricks. Yes, it is normal for a new administration to bring in its own people, but shouldn't a DA have some respect for rules?

Friends in Johnson County claim that some of those fired were in the middle of trials, or that at the very least, trials were suspended for a day because no one knew who was going to get fired. Does anyone know if any of that is true? If it is, that is also cause for concern.

And finally, Kline's huge DA salary is again under fire.

This week in Kansas: The Lawrence GLBT community has high hopes for domestic partner registry

By Diane Silver

Information about the proposed domestic partner registry is in danger of getting crowded out by our Iraq commentaries. I'm posting links to the two most recent posts, which include information from Tuesday's City Commission meeting. I plan to have more this weekend.

As far as I know right now, we're still in a holding pattern, waiting for the city to draft the ordinance and to send it to the attorney general for review. I'll let you know as soon as I learn of a change.

Here are the most recent posts on the subject.

A brief outline of how a domestic partner registry could work in Lawrence

Lawrence poised to approve domestic partner registry

Ouch! Ugh. Yuck.

By Diane Silver

Many apologies for our silence over the last couple of days. My blogging partners have been tied up, and as for myself, well... When I went into the dentist on Thursday to see about a sore tooth, 10 minutes turned a root canal and almost two hours in the dentist's chair. Ugh. Seriously, ugh. It's the second time I've had a root canal, and that is not something that gets better with age.

Meanwhile, I'm going to catch up on some of what we missed by posting a few headlines.

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

From Kansans who lost a son in Iraq: Bring our troops home

By Diane Silver

Today as we waited for President Bush's speech about Iraq, I received a copy of the following letter in my hopeandpolitics email. The letter touched me with its honesty, its grief and its truth, and I want to share it with you. It seems fitting to do that in the hours right after Bush's speech.

The writer had just faxed the letter to the office of Rep. Nancy Boyda, a freshman Kansas Democrat who won her seat in large part because of her opposition to the war in Iraq. Boyda recently said in an interview, though, that she would vote to fund Bush's troop "surge." The writer of the letter asked that I not use her name or her partner's name because of their family's connections to the federal government. Here is the letter:

Dear Rep. Boyda,

I am writing to ask that you reconsider your position on the surge in troops that President Bush will outline in his speech to the country this evening. I am not a military strategist or an expert in warfare or an historian. But this war has touched me personally and I am an expert in some of the suffering caused by war.

My partner _______ lost her only child on a road in Taji, Iraq in July 2004. He was driving the Humvee when the IED detonated. The explosion left a 30 foot crater in the earth. The damage was so extensive and complete that not much of his body was recovered for burial.

Since that death two and one-half years ago, our lives have been completely overshadowed by the grief that descends upon a parent whose child has been killed. Despite the best efforts of (her) health care professionals, she still suffers with migraine headaches at least 3 days per week. If only the migraines were the worst of her pain.

We were opposed to this war from the start and will always believe this country was deceived and misled into this war. America has squandered the support shown to us in the aftermath of September 11

We were once a nation with a reputation for protecting and defending human rights. Now we are a nation that sanctions indefinite detention and torture. In my view, the only thing more overwhelming than the shame of our actions is the relentless grief we have inflicted on all of the soldiers, families and citizens of both countries.

You asked us before the election in 2006 if we'd had enough. We responded with a collective and resounding YES. We have had enough of this war and the lives it has destroyed. We have had enough of the deception and the corruption and profiteering. We have had enough of the intense pain and suffering and cannot imagine inflicting it on any other living being on this planet.

Please reconsider your support for the surge option. Bring our troops home.

President Bush's Iraq Plan

From Pamela:

Listening to President Bush speak tonight, I couldn't help but wonder where he is living... Pleasantville? The Truman Show? La-La Land?

He (or his speechwriter and advisors) seem to have missed the most salient point. The sectarian violence in Iraq isn't about Sunni and Shii. Iraqi Sunnis and Shiis have historically gotten along well. It's about politics. It's about who supported America's strong man, Saddam Hussein back when he was still our buddy. It's about who supports the current American sponsored government, and who doesn't. It's about who cooperated with American troops and who didn't. That is the fundamental, root source of the conflict -- not concerns about sectarian theological differences.

As long as the US is involved, the conflict will escalate. The reprisals against collaborators will grow ever more intense. The stakes for those who are in power (more or less) will become higher and higher, as the guarantee of disruption and wholesale rebellion grows with each passing day they are seen as sell outs to the US occupation.

And, yes, that's what most of the world perceives it as. Not a war. Not a humanitarian effort to bring freedom to Iraq. But an occupation aimed as ensuring the US and Israel have access to Iraq's oil.

The resistence (otherwise known as terrorists in Bush's lingo) perceives themselves as trying to oust an invading and occupying army. Stepping up the number of troops on police duty isn't going to solve that problem.

The longer we are there, the more intense the resistence will become.

President Bush did have one thing right. If we leave now, Iraq will descend into chaos. I'm pretty sure that is accurrate. What he didn't say, was that when we leave in a year, or two or ten, that chaos will no doubt be even worse, the attrocities even more horrific.

I don't see any hope of the US and the new Iraqi government transforming Iraq into some fairy tale democracy like Bush spoke of. That has to be done by the Iraqis, not imposed by the army of another country. The longer we are there, the longer it will take for Iraqi to achieve those dreams after we leave.

The view from Washington: "Stay the course plus 20,000"

By Nancy Jane Moore

Speaking on NPR after Bush's speech, Jessica Tuchman Mathews of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace summed his proposed new plan up nicely:
Stay the course plus 20,000.
As she pointed out -- and as Dan Froomkin said earlier on washingtonpost.com -- Bush didn't provide the promised change in strategy. He simply set out a few changes in tactics and increased the number of troops on the ground.

It's not enough of a change to do anything, except cost a lot more lives.

Bush reiterated over and over that "failure in Iraq would be a disaster for the U.S." The problem is, we already failed in Iraq. And minor efforts to pick up the pieces aren't going to fix that.

And in yet another insult to our intelligence, he even managed to mention September 11 -- he's still trying to use that excuse to justify his actions.

He claimed his military advisors think his plans will work -- which contradicts the article in this morning's Washington Post, which said that most of the military advised against the troop increase. Maybe it's just me, but I tend to believe The Post on this one.

Bush said a couple of things that convinced me he still lives in a fantasy world. He kept talking about the freedom-loving people of Iraq and how we were going to leave a democracy there, when what we have really given the Iraqis is chaos and civil war.

And then he said if Iraqis don't step up and take charge, this effort will lose the support of the American people.

Mr. Bush, apparently you haven't been paying attention. You've already lost the support of the American people.

He did make one truthful comment: "The responsibility belongs to me." Yes, it does. But the suffering belongs to us all.

The view from Kansas: Thumbs down on Bush's Iraq plan

Diane:

Watching Shields and Brooks on PBS... isn't it amazing that they're both emphasizing that the tone of the speech is sober, as if this is something new for this president, and of course, it is.

This is too serious to be flippant.

So we send more forces, and we stay and hold neighborhoods? How long do we stay? When will these places be stable? Victory won't look like the victory of WWII, Bush says, so what does victory look like? Is there such a thing as victory?

VA Sen. Webb just raised an interesting point... will there ever be peace in Iraq if there are American troops on the streets of that nation?

From Joan with 80 years of experience:

Bush talked about the Iraqi government doing this and this and this, but will they do it? They haven't done it before. What makes this time different?

The Iraqi government doesn't have any power over there at all. The Iraqi leader comes over and tell Bush what he wants to hear. He doesn't tell the truth.

Bush's mention of Afghanistan is ridiculous. Isn't he aware that that is a mess again and it never did get cleaned out right before?

Everything from Bush is just words, words words. He says we have to have patience and wait for results, but for four years we had patience.

It's almost as if it's Vietnam. You keep throwing men and materials into that country to fight a war and stabilize it and then it doesn't work.

The view from Kansas, from Joan and Diane, is thumbs down.

Joan says: You want to know something else? I think if we got out of there, the other countries in the Middle East would say we have to do something, and they would take action.

Diane:

As I sit listening to my mother what strikes me is the anger in her voice.

Joan:

It makes me mad to have this happening all over again. My generation fought WWII, my father's generation fought WWI and here we are doing the same damn thing again. When will we learn?

From Kansas: Sinking stomachs & fear of more war & more blood

From Diane:

What role does Al Qaeda have in Anbar Province? Bush makes it sound like they are the only reason there are problems in Anbar. Actually, the real question is does Al Qaeda have any power there, or is this an illusion? The fact that I even ask this question shows how little credibility Bush has.

I'm sitting her listening to Bush and my heart is sinking. Bush says he's sending in more troops, U.S. Navy ships, and I remember the escalation in Vietnam. It was small at first, then steady, then huge. More and more young men died. Boys -- and yes, they were boys -- died and for what? Listening to Bush is like listening to LBJ then: Throw more bodies at the problem and more bodies and more.

Bush is still confusing 9/11 and the fight against terrorism with the war on Iraq. I am so sick of that.

Even more frightening, especially to the mother of a 21-year-old son is Bush's call to expand the military. What exactly is he talking about?

Here we go: Mom & I contemplate Bush & Iraq

by Diane Silver

First thoughts: For once Bush isn't smirking. It's about time.

George W Bush, Iraq & In This Moment

By Diane Silver

We're going to try a little experiment tonight and live blog President Bush's speech on the Iraq War. If all goes well -- and we haven't tried this before -- there will be four of us chatty folk commenting, ruminating and contemplating Bush's plan.

Our commentators will include our usual suspects, In This Moment bloggers Nancy Jane Moore and Pamela K. Taylor, along with myself. I am also going to bring along my mother -- yes friends, my Mom -- to help me blog this event.

This afternoon I realized that it would be fascinating to hear what Mom, aka Joan Silver, has to say about the speech. Mom turns 80 in two days. She was 15 when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and 19 when WW II ended. She was in her 40s during Vietnam. Tonight we intend to watch the speech together and discuss it. Thus, some of the ideas will be hers. The typos and misspellings will be all mine.

Stay tuned...

Sen. Kennedy has the right approach to stop the surge

By Nancy Jane Moore

Sen. Edward Kennedy has introduced a bill (pdf) that would require a vote of Congress authorizing funding before additional troops could be sent to Iraq.

The findings section of the bill contains the following language:
The mission of the Armed Forces of the United States today in Iraq no longer bears any resemblance to the mission of the Armed Forces authorized by Congress in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.
This section implies that the previous authorization is no longer sufficient to authorize Bush to commit additional funds without Congress -- a position I heartily endorse. It's about time someone pointed that out. And, obviously, refusing to authorize funds for more troops is the most practical way to stop Bush's pathetic effort to shore up his tattered legacy by throwing more lives away.

Unfortunately, the rest of the Democratic leadership is holding back. The New York Times reports this morning that both the Senate and the House are planning "symbolic" votes against the increase in troops. These votes would, as The Times points out, "do nothing in practical terms to block Mr. Bush's intention to increase the United States military presence in Iraq."

Don't the Democrats understand that they were elected to do something about the Iraq disaster? Don't they understand that they've got some real power now, and that many Republicans are edging away from Bush's crazy plans?

According to The Times, the Democrats do say that the symbolic vote is the "minimum" that they're going to do, and they haven't ruled out a cap on troops or a limit on funds. And if they've got a strategic plan to suck the sane Republicans into supporting these limits, I'm all for it.

But Bush is going to go on television tonight and announce his "surge" in troops. The Democrats need to counter that with something much more forceful than letters to the White House and "symbolic" votes.

Speaking of Bush's plans, The Washington Post reports this morning that Bush's decision to increase forces was made over the objections of his top military advisors. Apparently most of the military brass knows a lost cause when they see one.

Getting the US out of Iraq without making things even worse is a tricky proposition -- as I've said before, the only good solution to the Iraq War would be to go back in time and not invade, and unfortunately that option doesn't exist.

But how many more US soldiers have to die or suffer life-altering injuries while the Democrats fiddle around with "symbolic" votes instead of stopping Bush?

Thanks to Balkinization for the link to the Kennedy bill.

Kansas: A brief outline of how a domestic partner registry could work in Lawrence

By Diane Silver

Details of Lawrence's proposed domestic partner registry are still being determined, but a general outline of how it might work emerged from Tuesday night's City Commission meeting.

The registry would not automatically grant any of the legal rights married couples enjoy to same-sex couples and their children.

However, registration would probably exempt families headed by same-sex couples from Lawrence's ordinance limiting the number of unrelated people who can live in one household. That ordinance currently makes it illegal for a family that includes a same-sex couple, a child and an elderly parent to live together within city limits.

Registration could also be used as proof to employers, insurance companies and others that a family headed by a same-sex couple actually is a family and, thus, eligible for benefits. However, city commissioners seemed clear that they did not want to require local employers to offer benefits such as health insurance to registered partners.

Other possible details of the registry, which would be run by the city clerk, include:
  • Opening the registry to heterosexual as well as same-sex couples.
  • Requiring a fee to register, although that size of the fee wasn't discussed.
  • Requiring a couple to provide certain kinds of proof that the couple is actually a domestic partnership. Such proof could take the form of documents showing financial transactions carried out by the couple as a couple.
The City Commission did not discuss whether residents of other cities in Kansas could come to Lawrence and register. However, such an option could be offered.

As I wrote last night, we do appear to have the votes for the registry to become law. The next step is for city staff to draft an ordinance and then to submit it to Attorney General Paul Morrison's office for a review. Mayor Mike Amyx asked for the review in light of the 2005 passage of the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and civil unions.

I'll post a copy of the draft ordinance as soon as it becomes available. I hope to post more details on Tuesday night's discussion and testimony within the next few days, but now I'm off to pay the mortgage on my day job.

By the way, the Lawrence Journal-World's coverage of the meeting was generally accurate, but the newspaper certainly underplayed the significance of Maggie Childs and her "local group."

Maggie leads the Lawrence Chapter of the Kansas Equality Coalition. The Equality Coalition is a unified statewide organization that works for fair laws for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered Kansans. The Equality Coalition has chapters stretching from Johnson County to Salina, Wichita and Southwest Kansas, and it is a direct outgrowth of the group formed to fight the marriage ban in 2005.

In the name of full disclosure, I helped organize the Equality Coalition and have been a member of the Lawrence Chapter board, although I'm not currently serving.

Kansas: Rep. Nancy Boyda apologizes for remarks, but she still seems unaware of her options

By Diane Silver

Calling her remarks to ABC's Charles Gibson "first-week jitters," Rep. Nancy Boyda held a teleconference call with reporters yesterday where she apologized for her statements about Iraq.

However, Boyda said she would still vote to fund a troop escalation in Iraq. She also failed to mention that legal experts say Congress has a series of options they can use to stop President George W. Bush.

In This Moment's earlier coverage of Boyda's statements can be found here and here and here.

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Kansas: Lawrence poised to approve domestic partner registry

By Diane Silver

As the cliches note, don't count your chickens before they're hatched and most decidedly don't consider the game over until the fat lady sings. While neither of those things has happened yet, it was clear tonight that a proposal creating a domestic partner registry in Lawrence has the three votes needed to pass.

City commissioners Mike Rundle, Boog Highberger and David Schauner all expressed support for the measure. The City Commission has five members and one member, Sue Hack, was not present tonight. If passed, this proposal would make the home of the University of Kansas the only city in the state with any form of legal recognition for same-sex couples. The domestic partner registry, by the way, would probably be open to both heterosexual and same-sex couples.

A vote wasn't taken tonight. Instead, the commissioners told city staff to draft an ordinance and to send it on to the office of newly elected Kansas Attorney General Paul Morrison. The commissioners want Morrison's opinion on whether the ordinance is constitutional, given that the state amended the constitution last year to ban same-sex marriage and civil unions.

Toni Ramirez Wheeler, interim director of the city's legal services division, said she believed a registry would be constitutional, but Mayor Mike Amyx wanted the opinion of the AG. There was no immediate word on when the ordinance would be drafted and sent to Morrison's office.

Most of the meeting was taken up by Wheeler's report and a hearing where six people spoke in favor of the registry. No one appeared in opposition. In fact, the packed room appeared to be half to two-thirds full of supporters of the proposal. The rest of the audience seemed to be attending to discuss such issues as traffic circles and neighborhood planning.

Wheeler's report is available online.

I just got back from the meeting, to which I stupidly forgot to take my laptop. Instead of live blogging, here's your report about an hour after the end of the event. It galls me to admit that the local newspaper did what this blogger forgot to do, but let me note that the Journal-World's live blogged report is here.

Note that there are a few errors in that blogged report and some fragmentary information.

"Bill N." is actually Bruce Ney, senior counsel for AT&T. He served as chair of Kansans For Fairness, which fought the constitutional ban on marriage in 2005. Bruce lives in Lawrence.

Forrest Swall is a former legislator who represented Lawrence in the Kansas House. Forrest appear for PFLAG.

Lori Messinger is an assistant professor of social welfare at KU.

I'll have more on what everyone said as soon as I can.

Kansas: Phill Kline cleans house & Johnson County braces for the aftermath

As expected, newly appointed Johnson County District Attorney Phill Kline fired seven attorneys on his new staff, including his opponent in the race for DA, Steve Howe.

Also given just a few hours to clean out their offices were longtime juvenile division chief John Fritz and Bryan Denton, the chief investigator for 15 years.

It is sad and a little frightening to see so much experience leaving the DA's office. We can only hope that the incoming staff members not only know what they're doing, but actually intend to prosecute criminals instead of pushing the Religious Right's political agenda.

The KC Star has the story and details on new Kansas Attorney General Paul Morrison's house cleaning.

Dear Congressional Democrats: You DO have the power to stop the Iraq escalation.

By Diane Silver

This post by my blogging partner Nancy Jane Moore is so important that instead of replying to her via the comments field, I'm going to make a separate post. I want to make certain people read what she wrote.

My esteemed and learned colleague, who likes to call herself a "recovering attorney," has uncovered some key insights from several law professors. Their point? The Constitution does indeed give Congress the power to stop George W. Bush from escalating the war in Iraq.

Read Nancy's post and follow the links. I stand by much of what I said about Rep. Nancy Boyda's recent interview on Iraq, but I do retract my support of Boyda's belief that Congress is powerless to stop Bush.

If what these professors are saying is really true, then it is time for the Democratic Congress to stand up to the bully-in-chief who is occupying the White House. It's time for the Boydas, Pelosis and Reids of this nation to act.

Kansas: Lawrence considers the death defying feat of being fair to same-sex couples

By Diane Silver

Today is the day the Lawrence City Commission will begin its deliberations on a proposed domestic partner registry.

If approved, this would be the first registry of its kind in Kansas, but Lawrence would actually be playing catch-up to other Midwestern cities. Domestic partner registries are already in place in Kansas City, Mo.; Iowa City, Iowa; Boulder, Colo.; and Madison, Wis.

The proposal is being championed by the Lawrence Chapter of the Kansas Equality Coalition.

The Lawrence Journal-World makes it sound like the City Commission will make the decision at today's meeting. I was under the impression that the proposal would only be up for a little discussion and then would be sent off for more study. However, anything is possible when a governmental body meets.

The newspaper reports that only four of the five commissioners will be attending tonight's meeting. Two of the four have said they support a registry. The proposal needs three votes to pass.

The meeting starts at 6:35 tonight. Be there.

A note on my headline: A domestic partner registry would provide no rights, and thus it wouldn't come even close to bringing legal fairness to the lives of same-sex couples. However, it is a start. I decided to use my rather strongly worded headline because a start is better than nothing, and a registry could have a tangible effect on the lives of our families.

Kansas Moments: Phill Kline prepares to oust rival; Paul Morrison worries & Kathleen Sebelius talks of hope

By Diane Silver

Inauguration day saw the start of the second administration of Gov. Kathleen Sebelius along with the great job swap between Phill Kline and Paul Morrison. Here's a roundup of what happened and bits and pieces of what may come.

Phill Kline -- the darling of the Religious Right -- is rumored to be ready to fire seven lawyers in the Johnson County District Attorney's office. Among them is Steve Howe, who ran against Kline for the DA job. The DA's office in the state's most populous county isn't small, but the loss of even seven experienced attorneys will hurt. One can only hope that Kline actually tries to do the job of DA, instead of pursuing his continuing efforts to push the political agenda of the Religious Right. The KC Star covered Kline's swearing in.

Paul Morrison took over as Kansas attorney general and immediately said he would fire Kline's special prosecutor Don McKinney, an anti-abortion activist hired to prosecute the the most well-known abortion provider in the state. Morrison also said he was concerned about the security of medical records, given that they may be in McKinney's hands. Morrison has good reason to be worried, given McKinney's past and present activities.

Meanwhile, Gov. Kathleen Sebelius was inaugurated for her second term. Here's a story about the event and here's a transcript of her speech.

Monday, January 08, 2007

Congress has the power to stop Bush's troop escalation

By Nancy Jane Moore

New Kansas Rep. Nancy Boyda and a number of other members of Congress are mistaken: The Constitution does give Congress the power to stop Bush from increasing the number of troops in Iraq.

Constitutional law scholar Marty Lederman points out on Balkinization that Congress can pass a law prohibiting the surge in troops and requiring a phased pullout. They can also refuse to pay for more than a certain number of troops. He says:
If Congress does nothing to instantiate its strongly stated views about this most important matter of public policy, but resorts to mere pleading to the President to do the right thing, I fear that the Democratic Leadership letter will be viewed as implying that this is a decision for the President alone to make, and that Congress has no legal say in the matter. Nothing could be further from the truth.
In a second post on this subject, Lederman adds:
Even if there were a prohibition in the Constitution against so-called congressional "micromanagement" of a war -- and there's not -- this [a law limiting the number of troops] wouldn't be that. There would be no congressional officials here overseeing the President's discretionary responsibilities; no requirement that the President get approval of one or both Houses before taking certain actions. There would, instead, simply be limitations on a war imposed by statutes passed with the President's signature or by supermajorities of both Houses of Congress over the President's veto.
Another law professor, Neil Kinkopf of Georgia State University, makes similar arguments on the American Constitution Society blog. Kinkopf says the Constitution gives Congress the right to make Bush submit his troop plan to them for approval. He writes:
The Constitution grants Congress extensive war powers – so extensive, in fact, that Chief Justice John Marshall once wrote that “The whole powers of war being, by the Constitution of the United States, vested in Congress, the Acts of that body can alone be resorted to as our guides ….” (Talbot v. Seeman (1801).
Like Lederman, Kinkopf says Congress can either limit the scope of the war or limit the use of money:
Congress may limit the scope of the present Iraq War by either of two mechanisms. First, it may directly define limits on the scope of that war -- and forbid the President from exceeding these limits -- such as by imposing a ceiling on the number of troops assigned to that conflict. Second, it may achieve the same objective by enacting appropriations riders that limit the use of appropriated funds.
Kinkopf also brings up an interesting argument in relation to Congress's original actions approving the Iraq War: Bush got that vote by doing what is called in consumer law a "bait and switch." In other words, he deceived Congress and kept them from having all the information they should have had when they voted. He considers that grounds for them to revisit the authorization.

Congress has apparently grown so accustomed to acting as Bush's lapdog that even those who oppose him have forgotten what kind of power they're supposed to have. I suggest we all forward the information on Balkinization and the American Constitution Society blog to Rep. Boyda and other Congress members who are making this mistake. Perhaps a few of them will wake up.

Kansas: Nancy Boyda's big day, or are we betrayed yet again?

By Diane Silver

As I rolled over this morning with the radio blasting in my ear and contemplated getting out of bed, I heard a report about newly minted Congresswoman Nancy Boyda.

ABC's Charles Gibson asked: Would she oppose the president's plan to escalate the war in Iraq?

Heck no, she said.

When I heard her words my stomach flopped, and I had two immediate thoughts:

1. Boyda's crazy.

2. We are in deep trouble.

Given my work schedule, this is the first minute I've had to blog about the issue. My in box certainly hasn't been silent on it, though.

As you have probably already seen on the blogosphere, a lot of people have been angered by Boyda's comments. Crooks and Liars has the clip. Here's the transcript of the interview.

Gibson: Would you vote in favor of money to support another 20,000 to 40,000 troops in Iraq?

Boyda: I think we're going to vote to support what the commander in chief and head of military asks to do. At least, I am certainly going to vote to support it.

Gibson: If he wants the surge, he'll get it.

Boyda: Yes.… He is the commander in chief, Charlie. We don't get that choice. Congress doesn't make that decision.

Gibson: But the polls would indicate, and indeed, so many voters when they came out of the ballot box, said, "We're voting because we want something done about the war and we want the troops home."

Boyda: They should have thought about that before they voted for President Bush not once, but twice.

While I was busy working to pay the mortgage, angry emails were bouncing into my Hope & Politics inbox. One writer noted that he felt the same way now that he did when Boyda first declared her support for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Frankly, her support of an amendment is one reason why I have been lukewarm on her in the past.) My correspondent wrote:

Are we betrayed again?

After thinking about it for the last day, my feeling is that it is too early to tell.

There are a couple of things about the interview that strike me. One is that the quotes are politically naive and incredibly unsophisticated. At the very least they insult the voters in her district (Hey you dolts, you voted for Bush twice!). I suspect her wording either came from, well, stupidity (jury is still out on that) or simple inexperience.

The second thing that strikes me about Boyda's quotes is that she is actually telling the truth about the power of Congress. That institution does not have the power to stop George W. Bush. It can't pass a law or a resolution that would tie his hands. All Congress can do is cut funding. A great idea, but would it put the troops in Iraq in greater danger?

I honestly don't know if Congress could tie the dollars up enough. Would any budget cut come out of the money destined to pay for a troop "surge," or would it come from spending needed to protect our troops who are already in Iraq?

The Lawrence Journal-World reported that Boyda's staff says that was exactly the point she was trying to make.

Her top staffer on Friday said Boyda’s remarks were “a sound byte that sounded out of place.”

“She was really referring to the options Congress has,” said Shanan Guinn, Boyda’s chief of staff, about the comments regarding voters. “Nancy has the utmost respect for all of her constituents whether they voted for her or not.”

Guinn also denied that the comments to support sending more troops represented a change in Boyda’s position on the war.

“Nancy has been very clear stressing to vote to support the troops on the ground,” she said. “I don’t think anybody expects her to pull support from the troops while they are in harm’s way.”

Boyda is in a difficult position because her district includes, not only conservative voters, but Fort Riley. Personally, I don't think it would be right for her to pull the budget rug out from under the troops already in country. It's not right politically and it's not right morally.

KC Buzz Blog calls this a "teapot tempest." While I believe that some in the blogosphere may be treating Boyda a little harshly, I also don't believe that this is a storm in a teapot.

Nothing will change until the people of this nation, Congress and members like Boyda stand up to President Bush. I would much rather have heard Boyda say that she is frustrated by what appears to be Congress' lack of power in this situation. I would much rather have heard her say that she will do everything she can to end the war as soon as possible.

Was Boyda tripped up by a twist of the tongue, a lack of experience or did she lie all through her campaign? I don't know, but I know that we will find out in the next two years, and her future depends on the answer.

The danger of American fascism & what really needs to be done about the religious right

By Diane Silver

A fascinating and frightening interview with Chris Hedges has been posted at Salon. A former New York Times bureau chief in the Middle East and the Balkans, Hedges has a new book out called American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America.

After a career spent covering fascism overseas, Hedges started examining the Religious Right in the United States and discovered amazing similarities between the American right and totalitarian movements.
I think there are enough generic qualities that the group within the religious right, known as Christian Reconstructionists or dominionists, warrants the word. Does this mean that this is Nazi Germany? No. Does this mean that this is Mussolini's Italy? No. Does this mean that this is a deeply anti-democratic movement that would like to impose a totalitarian system? Yes.
Two things stand out in the interview, which was conducted by Michelle Goldberg, who also wrote about the religious right in Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism.

One is Hedges' assessment that this country is only one crisis away from seeing the dominionists come to power. Such a crisis could take the form of worsening economic problems or a terrorist attack, and the resulting upheaval and fear would drive the push for fascism.

The other thing that struck me was Hedges diagnosis of the problem that is driving people to the religious fight. The problem is despair, both economic and personal. Others have done a great job of describing the economic despair, but few have tackled the issue of the psychological despair. (Michael Lerner in The Left Hand of God is one of the few who has tried.)
For me, the engine of the movement is deep economic and personal despair. A terrible distortion and deformation of American society, where tens of millions of people in this country feel completely disenfranchised, where their physical communities have been obliterated, whether that's in the Rust Belt in Ohio or these monstrous exurbs like Orange County, where there is no community. There are no community rituals, no community centers, often there are no sidewalks. People live in empty soulless houses and drive big empty cars on freeways to Los Angeles and sit in vast offices and then come home again. You can't deform your society to that extent, and you can't shunt people aside and rip away any kind of safety net, any kind of program that gives them hope, and not expect political consequences.
Like Hedges (and Lerner), I believe these problems are at the heart of the desperation in so many people's lives.

Books like Hedges are important. We all need to be aware and be politically involved in the fight against the religious right.

However, political action, no matter how strong and organized, will never stop such an anti-democratic movement. Fascism can't be stopped until we heal our society and create a culture that provides hope, community and meaning to people's lives.

Sunday, January 07, 2007

Scientists say ExxonMobil is using junk science to muddy the waters on global warming

By Nancy Jane Moore

ExxonMobil is funding front organizations that use junk science to argue that global warming is not a problem, the Union of Concerned Scientists said in a report issued Jan. 3.

In fact, the UCS said, Exxon's campaign strongly resembles Big Tobacco's major disinformation campaign that contradicted overwhelming evidence about the risks associated with cigarettes. Exxon is even using some of the same people, the report says.

In their press release for the report, the UCS says Exxon:
  • raised doubts about even the most indisputable scientific evidence
  • funded an array of front organizations to create the appearance of a broad platform for a tight-knit group of vocal climate change contrarians who misrepresent peer-reviewed scientific findings
  • attempted to portray its opposition to action as a positive quest for "sound science" rather than business self-interest
  • used its access to the Bush administration to block federal policies and shape government communications on global warming
Campaigns that manipulate information to protect a company's business interests are a modern fact of life. I suspect most companies do it, in one way or another. And, unfortunately, most of us go along with this: It appears to be a sad truth of modern corporate life that people who are generally quite moral in their personal lives don't raise strong objections when their company does something that they know is wrong. (If you have ever worked for a large company, you are probably uncomfortably aware of just how easy it is to convince yourself that you can't stop bad decisions anyway, so why should you put your job at risk.)

But Exxon's efforts are particularly heinous, because we must make some serious immediate changes to prevent long term disaster from human-caused climate change.

It's difficult enough for human beings to wrap their brains around the idea that we are affecting the climate. As Daniel Gilbert points out in his witty book about how the human mind works, Stumbling on Happiness, we are very good at appreciating the danger of immediate attack -- like a charging tiger -- but lousy at understanding risks where the potential disaster is years down the road.

Global warming is just that kind of problem: By the time we see unmistakable signs, it's going to be way too late to stop it. We have to use our intellectual skills to understand the problem, because our instincts aren't so finely tuned that they react to long term dangers. That's why we need good science -- and we also need to educate ourselves and our children so that we can understand good science.

Funding junk science and using corporate power to encourage journalists and policymakers to treat crackpots with the same respect as the real experts undermines our efforts to truly understand what is happening to our planet. The process is difficult enough when we don't have to wade through distortions. ExxonMobil and the others who are cynically creating uncertainty must be stopped.

You can link to a pdf copy of the full report, "Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to 'Manufacture Uncertainty' on Climate Change," from the UCS press release.

The Union of Concerned Scientists also has a nice FAQ section on global warming.

Friday, January 05, 2007

Kansas Moments: Kline refuses to share, Sebelius moves forward & the GOP lurches further right

By Diane Silver

Here's a quick look around the news from the heartland this morning.

The Wichita Eagle's blog, WE Blog, asks a good question: If outgoing Attorney General Phill Kline is so hot to prosecute Dr. George Tiller, why won't Kline share his files with Sedgwick County District Attorney Nola Foulston? The local DA is the person with the authority to prosecute the Wichita abortion provider. What gives?

Gov. Kathleen Sebelius reveals her new $7 million economic development plan, help for the rural economy and keeps pushing for health care for children.

All signs point to the Kansas Republican Party continuing its rightward lurch when it picks a new chair. None of the announced candidates are moderate, which isn't a suprise given that ultra conservatives control the party apparatus. Announced candidates include such stalwarts of the religious right as state Sen. Tim Huelskamp of Fowler, law professor and former Congressional candidate Kris Kobach and Wichita businessman Mike Pompeo. Even Kline is rumored to be interested. The best way to understand the party race is to read Kansas GOP Insider, who really appears to be who he/she claims.

Meanwhile, the new moderate majority on the state Board of Education is moving quickly to search for a new education commissioner to replace recently resigned Bob Corkins, yet another darling of the religious right.

Western Kansas continues to struggle under the snow, and we wish them all the best and all the help they need. The problems include power outages and a desperate struggle for ranchers who are trying to keep their cattle alive.

Finally, please look again at a story that is receiving too little play in Kansas: Who is Phill Kline's special prosecutor?

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Kansas: Who is really behind new attacks on Attorney General-Elect Paul Morrison?

By Diane Silver

I received one of these robot phone calls attacking Paul Morrison, and it was truly vile, but it was also well produced. If you knew little about Morrison, you might well wonder what was going on with the state's new attorney general.

What I am wondering is why is Morrison being attacked before he even takes office, and who is really behind this.

On the surface, the man complaining about Morrison is Conrad J. Braun of San Diego. According to his call, Braun spent 11 years in prison on both state and federal charges. The Lawrence Journal-World reports that Braun has been in and out of the Larned Mental Health Facility and was convicted in 2005 of blackmail.

Given all that, I'm wondering how this person has the resources to start a coordinated campaign. Oh yes, the newspaper says he owns a calling company. Perhaps so, and perhaps these are the ravings of an unhinged person, but these attacks certainly are convenient for any future political opponents Morrison might have.

Make no mistake about it; this is a coordinated smear campaign. I've received numerous emails from Braun via my hopeandpolitics@yahoo.com address. As a blogger, I now receive many such "news releases."

Just like I experienced when I worked as a newspaper reporter, some of the folks who reach out to bloggers are, shall we say, not exactly working from a reality-based view of the world. When I can,I investigate and post informationI have been able to confirm. I wasn't able to do that with Braun, and thus, decided not to post on his claims.

However, the Journal-World has now made this public, so I am left with questions.

Although the charges are different, it seems remarkably similar to the "bottom-feeder" tactics defeated AG Phill Kline used against Morrison in the election. What the heck is going on?

Ms. Boyda goes to Washington

[Updated 6 p.m.]

By Diane Silver

Today's Lawrence Journal-World has a great story profiling Democrat Nancy Boyda's first few days in Congress as the new representative from east-central Kansas.

I know it's early, especially for a newly elected member of Congress, but I like what I see in that story. Boyda seems engaged, energetic, respectful but now overwhelmed by her new situation. I especially like her response to a staffer who told her that someone had just called looking for Jim Ryun, the longtime Republican incumbent Boyda defeated in November.
"Do whatever you need to do to not make that person feel awkward," Boyda instructed.
It's a small thing, acting in kindness, but it says a lot about a person's character.

[update]

Ms Boyda goes to Washington and takes the oath of office to become, officially, Rep. Nancy Boyda.

Rep. Ellison speaks up: It's time for a "politics of generosity & inclusion"

By Diane Silver

Much attention has been focused on Rep.-Elect Keith Ellison, the first Muslim to be elected to Congress. In today's Washington Post he finally speaks up for himself and does so most eloquently. The entire piece is worth reading for what it says about who we should be as a country.

Here's an excerpt.
Recently, I have become the focus of some criticism for my use of the Qu'ran for my ceremonial swearing in. Let me be clear, I am going to be sworn into office like all members of Congress. I am going to swear to uphold the United States Constitution. We seem to have lost the political vision of our founding document -- a vision of inclusion, tolerance and generosity.

I do not blame my critics for subscribing to a politics of scarcity and intolerance. However, I believe we all must project a new politics of generosity and inclusion This is the vision of the diverse coalition in my Congressional district. My constituents in Minnesota elected me to fight for a new politics in which a loving nation guarantees health care for all of its people; a new politics in which executive pay may not skyrocket while workers do not have enough to care for their families. I was elected to articulate a new politics in which no one is cut out of the American dream, not immigrants, not gays, not poor people, not even a Muslim committed to serve his nation.
Pamela K. Taylor and Nancy Jane Moore have posted about Ellison on In This Moment.

Just a little more on Rep. Ellison & Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an

By Pamela K. Taylor

In the past few weeks, the blogosphere has been afire over Rep.-Elect Keith Ellison's plan to take his oath on the Qur'an during the ceremonial Congressional swearing-in that is taking place this week. Led by nationally syndicated pundit Dennis Praeger and goaded on by Republican representative from Virginia, Virgil Goode, Ellison's critics have complained that using a Qur'an is un-American, claiming that only Bibles are acceptable for taking oaths as this country is a Christian nation.

Now it has surfaced that Ellison is planning to take his oath on a Qur'an owned by none other than, our third President, Thomas Jefferson, the principle author of the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson was also author of the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom, and a staunch supporter of religious freedom.

This law reads:

"No man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burdened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities."

One can't help but think that Thomas Jefferson would wholly approve of Mr. Ellison swearing on the religious book that means the most to him, especially as it is one from Mr. Jefferson's personal library.

As an Ellision spokesperson says, "Jefferson's Quran dates religious tolerance to the founders of our country," he added.

The Qur'an itself was published in 1764, some twenty years after Ellison's ancestors arrived in America.

One can only hope that representatives with opinions such as Mr. Goode's -- who called Mr. Ellison's proposal a threat to American values -- will reconsider just what America's values are. We have never been a nation dedicated to implementing Christianity, or even to Christian values. Rather, we were founded on the notion that religion and morality is fundamentally a personal issue, one which the state has no business regulating, whether that relates to the God you worship, your choice of marriage partner, or any other moral issue.

For more discussion on the issue, look at In This Moment's comments and click here, or here, or here.

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Kansas: Questions are raised about Phill Kline's special prosecutor & violent anti-abortion activists

By Diane Silver

Frederick Clarkson at Talk To Action has an interesting article about what he says is a connection between newly appointed special prosecutor Donald McKinney and violent anti-abortion activists.

At the very least, McKinney may have been a friend of Paul deParrie, an anti-abortion activist who died in May. DeParrie "characterized violence against doctors who perform abortion as 'morally justifiable,'" according to deParrie's hometown newspaper, The Oregonian.

The connection between McKinney and deParrie appears to be highlighted in a comment on the Operation Rescue blog by a person identifying himself as Donald “the Dingo” McKinney. In praising deParrie after his death from a heart attack, this person noted (my emphasis):
Paul was the real deal. A true Christian warrior. He was a great "leader" in the purest sense...And there was one other thing about Paul that contantly amazed me: he and I almost always agreed about everything -- from church issues to pro-life controversys to legal tactics. He was a true brother.
Is this the same Don McKinney as the man just appointed to prosecute Wichita abortion provider, Dr. George Tiller? Does McKinney believe that violence against abortion doctors is "morally justifiable?"

If that friendship existed, then it not only raises serious questions about McKinney, but about the judgment of Phill Kline.

Tiller, by the way, was wounded in 1993 by an anti-abortion activist.

Does McKinney sympathize with violent activists who have already targeted Tiller? If so, how can McKinney fairly do his job as special prosecutor? If this is true, what does it say about the judgment of the soon-to-be district attorney of Johnson County?

Clarkson raises the questions and wonders why the Kansas news media, particularly The Wichita Eagle, have ignored this story. I wish I had the time to investigate this, but outside of doing a little Googling and finding some links, I can't do anything more.

Some might argue that this issue is moot. Attorney General-Elect Paul Morrison has already said he will not retain McKinney as special prosecutor. Kline is leaving as attorney general in less than a week. Why should anyone care now?

Personally, I believe it's important to watch what Kline does. At the very least, the quality of his judgment is an important issue for the citizens of Johnson County. Like it or not, he will be their district attorney for the next two years. The quality of his decisions will have a major impact on their lives and their safety.

But that isn't the only reason to watch what's happening. Kline shows every sign of having further political aspirations. Kansas' tiny blogosphere has been buzzing with rumors that he might run to be chair of the state GOP. He is a longtime leader of the far right wing of the state Republican Party, and he shows no sign of going away.

I don't have the answers, but I do know that questions need to be asked. Where does McKinney stand on these issues, and why did Kline appoint him?

The Quran, Mr. Ellison & Thomas Jefferson

Following up on Nancy Jane Moore's post about the uproar over the country's first Muslim Congressman taking the oath of office on a Quran instead of a Bible... Rep.-elect Keith Ellison will take the ceremonial oath on a Quran owned by Thomas Jefferson.

Good for you, Mr. Ellison!

Read Nancy's post for an overview of the stupidity of the attacks on Ellison.

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Marriage equality faces another challenge in Massachusetts

The future of thousands of families in the only state that allows same-sex couples to marry is in doubt now that the Massachusetts Legislature has voted to keep a proposed ban alive.

If the proposal gets the support of only 50 lawmakers in the next session, it will be put on the 2008 ballot. The Boston Globe reports that Massachusetts Governor-elect Deval Patrick said he was disappointed by the vote.

"We have never used the initiative petition to limit individual freedoms and personal privacy, but today’s vote was a regrettable step in that direction.

"We have work to do over the next year to turn this around," Patrick continued. "I am heartened by the fact that the overwhelming majority of the members of the Legislature – a margin of over 2 to 1 -- voted to move on. I pledge to do what I can to build on that momentum, so that our Constitution will continue to stand for liberty and freedom, and not discrimination."

Welcome to a new Kansas blog

A hearty hello to a new blog, Evolving in Kansas. Mousie Cat provides "a Kansas freelance writer's thoughts on science, evolution, education, religion, politics and more."

Welcome to the tiny Kansas blogosphere!

Eid ul Adha and the Culture of Commericalism

As we are celebrating the last day of Eid ul Adha and still recovering from the Christmas magic/mania, I thought I would post an article I wrote last year about the challenge the ever greater retail hype around Christmas poses to minority communities and the celebration of our holidays. With Christmas displays in some Cincinnati stores area going up before Halloween (an all time record for earliest retail Christmas campaign), the article is as relevant this year as it was last.


Religious Minorities and the Allure of Materialism
By Pamela K. Taylor

With Christmas still fresh in our minds, American Muslims are looking forward to our own holiday, Eid ul-Adha, a three day celebration that marks the successful completion of the Hajj, Islam’s annual pilgrimage to Mecca. For minority communities, Christmas is always a challenge, especially for those of us with kids. The lights, the carols, decorating the tree, candy covered gingerbread houses, Santa, his sleigh and his reindeer, and, most of all, the presents. It’s child heaven. The pressure to compete is fierce and many of us feel an enormous need to prove that our own faith has as much to offer kids, or at the very least that it has its own really good traditions even if they aren’t quite as glamorous as Christmas.

This year the Muslim community was particularly lucky. Christmas was neatly sandwiched between the two major events of the Islamic calendar – Ramadan and Hajj. With Ramadan and Eid ul Fitr falling in October, we had our own special month of fellowship and celebration to buttress the kids’ fortitude just before the November/December deluge. When the kids asked why we don’t celebrate Christmas, Muslim parents could point our own recent time of dinner parties, special foods, holiday sweets, new clothes, and, of course, presents. And if that didn’t quite satisfy their craving, we could remind them that Hajj and Eid ul-Adha was coming just a couple weeks later. More parties, more new clothes… more presents.

And there’s the rub. The push-pull. You want Eid to be just as good as Christmas, but you look at the stress, the holiday rush, the hassle of finding just the right gift for everyone on your list, the self-inflicted pressure to make Christmas perfect for the kids, and shudder to think Eid could become like that. You want it to be as fun and as memorable, but you don’t want it to become a carbon copy. You want to maintain its authenticity, but you’re not sure that authenticity can quite measure up, and you’re not sure you want it to, even if it could.

On the one hand, you’re delighted to find out that Hallmark is now making Eid cards and when you mail them you can pay your postage with a USPS Eid Stamp. You rejoice to find an Indian princess Barbie or building blocks with Arabian arches and domes. In a country where a person’s status is more often than not judged by the strength of his pocketbook, retail acknowledgement of Ramadan, Hajj, and the two Eids talks big to kids. It’s a validation of their identities as American and Muslims. It shows them that we are part and parcel of the fabric of this country, that we belong, we’re accepted.

On the other hand, you dread too much retail attention. You worry that consumerism will gut the spiritual aspects of Eid the way it has gutted much of the meaning of Christmas. When you set out your presents for Eid morning, you hope the kids realize that Eid is more about being grateful to God than getting goodies. You wonder if you would have gotten the kids quite so many presents if the spectacle of Christmas gift giving hadn’t just upped the ante two weeks ago. You wonder if the need to measure up is leading you down the garden path into the waiting arms of Sam’s Club and Kmart. And you wish that the Christian community hadn’t bought quite so fully into market capitalism’s message that more is better.

All along, to make matters worse, you’re second guessing yourself. When you hang lights, as Muslims in many countries do during Ramadan, you wonder if the kids will think you’re trying to copy Christmas, and sometimes you wonder yourself. When you pass out cookies to guests – a time honored Ramadan tradition, although in other cultures the norm may be baklava, date pasties, or sweet puddings, rather than coconut macaroons, powdered teacakes, lemon tarts, and chocolate peanut butter bull’s eyes – you hope the kids don’t think you’re just trying to trump sugar cookies with red and green sprinkles. You look to the American Jewish community and Hannukah, a relatively minor holiday in other Jewish communities which, because of it’s timing, has taken on a much larger role here, and wonder if this is a good thing, or a bad thing. It’s great to be able to say, look we’ve got it just as good as the rest of America, but not if it means you have to distort your own traditions all out of proportion.

It isn’t easy to decide how much rivalry is good and how much is too much, to know where the line lies between unhealthy competition and the kind that, like a longstanding school rivalry, deepens and intensifies loyalty. It’s tough to know whether to buying into American consumerism whole-heartedly, half-way, or not at all will help your kids learn to love their own traditions rather than look on others’ celebrations with envy. Will the glitz of all-out materialism make them love Eid the way Christian kids love Christmas (and do you want them to love it because of that, even if it does?) Or will they appreciate a more even-handed approach that balances fun with spirituality? Or perhaps, will they find the peace and tranquility of a more austere holiday that uplifts and instills a feeling of purity and grace more attractive?

Clearly there is no one answer that fits all children or all families. Sometimes, you feel like you are throwing darts at a board with your eyes closed, hoping you don’t hit anything fragile in the process. Other times, you move forward confidently, assured that you’re making the right choices, and trusting that God has guided you down the right path. But even in the best of times, it’s a balancing act in which you always feel a bit off-kilter.

Former chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff says gays should be allowed to serve openly

By Diane Silver

John M. Shalikashvili writes in Tuesday's New York Times that it's time for out lesbians and gays to be welcomed into the military and for don't ask-don't tell to be repealed.
I now believe that if gay men and lesbians served openly in the United States military, they would not undermine the efficacy of the armed forces. Our military has been stretched thin by our deployments in the Middle East, and we must welcome the service of any American who is willing and able to do the job.
That's the good news. The bad news is that the retired Army general thinks Congress should still wait to repeal the current policy.

Shalikashvili chaired the joint chiefs from 1993 to 1997. He opposed President Bill Clinton's effort to allow lesbians and gays to serve openly in 1993.

It's an op-ed worth reading. Registration is required, but the article is free online.

Monday, January 01, 2007

Kansas Moments: Serious questions, Phill Kline, a tainted special prosecutor & the state of the GOP

By Diane Silver

Here are a few Kansas political moments that popped up in news coverage recently.

The Wichita Eagle asks an important question about outgoing Attorney General Phill Kline's Ahab-like pursuit of abortion provider Dr. George Tiller: Has anyone thought about the children mentioned in those medical records Kline got from Tiller's clinic? Apparently the records show that children as young as 10 and 13 received abortions.

I am as pro-choice as you can be, but I also believe that pregnant youngsters are a sign that something is very wrong. Despite Kline's claim that he went after the records to investigate sexual crimes against children, Kline has publicly shown no interest in actually investigating crimes against these kids. Instead, Kline seems to only care about prosecuting Tiller. What gives and what really happened to those kids?

Andy Wollen, chairman of the moderate Kansas Traditional Republican Majority, starts off a recent Kansas City Star op-ed with a bang.
For Johnson County residents wondering who in the world elected the unqualified Phill Kline as our new district attorney, there’s an uncomfortable answer — you did.
Wollen notes that the precinct representatives who elected Kline were themselves elected in the Aug. 1 primary where only 15 percent of county voters participated. His point? Stop complaining and vote in the next primary.

Wollen also noted some important details about Kline's qualifications to be district attorney.
Kline claims to care passionately about the law, but he has allowed his law license to lapse three separate times since he was admitted to the Kansas Bar Association in 1987. He has already started to hire his ideological cronies to fill out the office, and career prosecutors have started finding employment elsewhere.
Meanwhile, the special prosecutor Kline appointed to go after Tiller has filed a motion to have the misdemeanors charges reinstated. A Sedgwick County judge has already thrown them out once and held a hearing where he refused to reinstate them.

Topping off this week's news is a report from Talk To Action that Kline's special prosecutor, Donald McKinney, is linked to, or at least an admirer of, the Army of God, an extremist and allegedly violent anti-abortion group. The tone of the Talk To Action story is so frothing at the mouth that it would be easy to discount it, but the information appears to be valid.

For those looking for perspective on the Kansas Republican Party

By Diane Silver

If you've wandered over from the Political Animal at Washington Monthly, you may well be looking for this post on the state of the Republican Party in Kansas, which ponders the question: Is the state GOP really in tatters as some bloggers claim? Or, to put it more accurately: Has Kansas finally fixed what was wrong with itself?

The quick answer? Not really, but there IS progress.

It's a racist thing. It's time y'all understood.

By Nancy Jane Moore

I'm in the final miles of a trip to Texas for the holidays. In a bad chain restaurant just outside of Memphis, I saw a young man wearing a t-shirt with this flag on it:


Under the flag it said:

It's a southern thang. Y'all wouldn't understand.

Well, I'm a southerner. Several of my ancestors fought for the Confederacy. My daddy sang "Dixie" at a Confederate Veterans' Reunion when he was a small child. When I took history in high school, they taught the civil war as "us" and "them" -- and believe me, "them" meant Yankees. I know all about Southern pride and the evils of reconstruction. And from studying the war in more objective fashion in college, I'm fully aware that slavery wasn't the only issue that divided north and south.

But a person waving that flag or wearing it on a t-shirt in the 21st Century is saying just one thing:

"I'm a racist."

I'm sure that young man would have made some argument about southern pride, but that discussion always seems to devolve into nostalgia for a time when "certain people" knew their place. Regardless of the other issues that drove southerners, you cannot divorce the Civil War from slavery. And slavery was a great evil. You cannot separate the Confederate flag from that evil.

The flag belongs in museums, not on people's backs.

Happy New Year!



Happy 2007 to one and all from the folks at In This Moment. May both you and the world be blessed in in the coming year.

Sunday, December 31, 2006

Revenge isn't justice

By Nancy Jane Moore

From all accounts, Saddam Hussein did terrible things over the course of his life. If you subscribe to the principles of karma, he deserved his ignoble end.

But his trial -- judging by the news reports -- was a mockery of legal process. As Juan Cole says, "The trial and execution of Saddam were about revenge, not justice."

The irony is that it would have been easy to convict Saddam of any number of horrible crimes while using even the relatively high standard of due process the US affords criminal defendants. This is not a case -- like those so beloved of TV cop shows -- where the bad guy would get away if we didn't bend the rules.

And the rules are important. Revenge may be a natural emotion -- we all want it when we've been ill-treated -- but civilized societies should not operative on revenge. It's primitive and it usually leads to more killing.

Justice systems were set up to weigh offenses and consequences dispassionately. They are imperfect -- they are created by human beings -- but even at their weakest they beat the hell out of vigilante justice and kangaroo courts. At their best, they deal fairly with those brought before them, convicting the guilty based on honest evidence and letting go those whose crimes cannot be proved.

The trial and execution of Saddam show a failure of the Iraqi justice system -- and a failure of the US, which let it happen. Justice systems should not be judged by how well they handle the easy cases, but what they do when principles are at stake. Here, the justice system failed miserably.

The Iraqi people got revenge for years of bad leadership and crimes against their fellow citizens. The US got revenge, though I'm not certain what we got it for -- the invasion of Kuwait? Plots against G. Bush Sr.? Deaths of our soldiers in Iraq? We'd still like revenge for September 11, but that had nothing to do with Saddam.

That we humans continue to let revenge call the shots in this world is yet another example of how we have not yet become civilized. We had a chance with the trial of Saddam to deal fairly with a man who never dealt fairly. We failed.