By Diane Silver
I do think this is a first. Barack Obama is buying full-page ads in LGBT newspapers in Texas and Ohio.
Does anyone remember any other presidential candidate, particularly a likely to win candidate, ever buying ads in the LGBT press?
Interesting.
Showing posts with label Texas primary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Texas primary. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Monday, February 25, 2008
Why I can't support Hillary Clinton in the Texas primary
By Nancy Jane Moore
I just heard NPR report that, in a speech in Washington, D.C., Hillary Clinton criticized Barack Obama for saying that he would be willing to talk to nations like Cuba or Iran.
That, coupled with Clinton's vote for the Iraq War and her unwillingness to admit she was wrong to do so, is why I can't vote for her in the Texas Democratic Primary. I am afraid that, as president, she would not change the incredibly wrong-headed foreign policy put in place by Bush.
That is, I'm voting for Obama because it's way past time for the U.S. to stop acting unilaterally in our foreign policy, and way past time we talked to both our friends and our enemies.
Both Obama and Clinton have good domestic policy proposals and electing either would shake up the white male power structure of this country, which needs shaking up. But that's not the only thing that needs shaking up, and when it comes to dealing with the rest of the world, I believe Obama will make the radical shifts that are needed. Clinton, I fear, will give us business as usual.
Of course, if Clinton does get the Democratic nomination, I'll vote for her without reservations. Her policy ideas are good and she is certainly more moderate in her foreign policy outlook than John McCain, who is trying to convince voters that the US is "winning" the Iraq War and suggesting that the US should stay there another 50 or 100 years. That's truly scary foreign policy.
I just heard NPR report that, in a speech in Washington, D.C., Hillary Clinton criticized Barack Obama for saying that he would be willing to talk to nations like Cuba or Iran.
That, coupled with Clinton's vote for the Iraq War and her unwillingness to admit she was wrong to do so, is why I can't vote for her in the Texas Democratic Primary. I am afraid that, as president, she would not change the incredibly wrong-headed foreign policy put in place by Bush.
That is, I'm voting for Obama because it's way past time for the U.S. to stop acting unilaterally in our foreign policy, and way past time we talked to both our friends and our enemies.
Both Obama and Clinton have good domestic policy proposals and electing either would shake up the white male power structure of this country, which needs shaking up. But that's not the only thing that needs shaking up, and when it comes to dealing with the rest of the world, I believe Obama will make the radical shifts that are needed. Clinton, I fear, will give us business as usual.
Of course, if Clinton does get the Democratic nomination, I'll vote for her without reservations. Her policy ideas are good and she is certainly more moderate in her foreign policy outlook than John McCain, who is trying to convince voters that the US is "winning" the Iraq War and suggesting that the US should stay there another 50 or 100 years. That's truly scary foreign policy.
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Vote early and often: Texans will use a combination of primary and caucuses on March 4
By Nancy Jane MooreIn this fascinating political year in which Democratic primaries and caucuses continue to count -- even if all the current talk about superdelegates harks back to the backroom deals of yore -- I've just made an interesting discovery: Here in Texas, we've got both a primary and caucuses on March 4.
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports that after the polls close, people can return to their precincts for caucuses, which will start the process of selecting about 30 percent of the Texas Democrats going to the national convention. (Something similar happens for Republicans.)
And you can both vote in the primary and participate in the caucus!
Here's how the Texas Democrats will choose their delegates, according to the Star-Telegram:
Texas will send 228 delegates to this year's Democratic National Convention in Denver. Of those delegates, 126 will be assigned to vote for candidates based on election results.
An additional 35 will be superdelegates, made up mostly of high-ranking officials, who may back whichever candidate they choose. This year's superdelegates include Fort Worth's Jim Wright, former U.S. House speaker; Fort Worth's Roy Laverne Brooks, vice chair of the Texas Democratic Party; and U.S. Rep. Chet Edwards, whose district stretches from Hood and Johnson counties south to Grimes County.
The remaining 67 delegates will be chosen through the caucus system -- with 42 being rank-and-file Democrats and 25 being party leaders and elected officials, according to a Lone Star Project report.
Seems to me that anyone with strong feelings about either Sen. Obama or Sen. Clinton needs to make a point of going to their precinct caucus. Those 67 delegates could make an impact.
Since I just moved from Washington, D.C., to Austin, Texas, I'm paying close attention to the voting rules. I have my priorities straight: I haven't got my Texas driver's license yet, but I managed to register to vote in time for the March 4 election.
Of course, the move means that I miss the "Potomac Primary" coming up next Tuesday in Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., but I expect the nomination will still be up for grabs on March 4.
And in Texas, I get to legally vote twice!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
